Attorney General of UK and C.P.S. pervert justice
J.A.T. Ovadje
2006/2422
Court of Appeal; Royal Court of Justice, Strand: Application for Judicial Review Case no: 2006 /2422
NOTICE TO COURT 15 December 2006
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (Appellant) v Attorney General of the United Kingdom and the Crown Prosecution Service (Respondents).
Notice of evidence that the Respondents have acted as to pervert justice on behalf of freemasonry and even on other occasions unrelated to this case.
1.Firstly, I wish to remind the court that the original application in my case is based on the fact that the freemasons (who killed my brother Ejoke Ovadje, a solicitor) sponsored Ms. D to kill me with the collusion of the Metropolitan Police and the Respondents (Lord Goldsmith the Attorney General of the U.K. and the Director of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) Sir Kenneth MacDonald).
In Nigeria, my brother ran for office on an anti-corruption platform against the corrupt interests of members of the freemasons (and its off-shoot the pyrates) who have kept 75% of the population living on less than a dollar a day amidst huge oil wealth. Earlier they had invited him to join the freemasons with a bait of winning cases before he gets to court (i.e. pervert justice) an offer he refused.
2. In February 2005, the assailant Ms. D (a co-tenant sponsored by freemasonry) repeatedly poisoned me with insecticide. I reported to the Metropolitan Police and followed it up with letters but the Metropolitan Police refused to investigate. Her husband boasted in freemasonry and openly stated: I am well connected, even if you report to the police, nothing will happen.
3.Then on 23 April 2005 (i.e. 2-3-4-5 of freemasonry akin to 9-11 of al-Queda), Ms. D battered me with more than forty blows, repeatedly bit me then threatened to and almost killed me with a six-inch blade knife pressed against the carotid artery of my neck. The Metropolitan Police was called but again (under masonic instruction) refused to investigate. The police even refused to ask for the knife that Ms. D. used to try to kill me. By the Grace of God, the evidence was so overwhelming (photographs of bites, hospital records of injuries etc.) that the case could not be suppressed.
The Respondents Lord Goldsmith the Attorney General of the U.K. and the Director of the Crown Prosecution Service then pursued a course of conduct of masonic fraud as to pervert justice and concocted a secret and fictitious ‘Ms. D’s version’ of events and corruptly refused to prosecute her despite the photographs and hospital records. Till date, they have refused to disclose that secret version of events to myself (the victim and Appellant) or to the court but corruptly claimed to have acted with the ‘rule of law’.
Against the evidence of photographs & hospital records of injuries that Ms. Draper inflicted on me, my property she destroyed and my shirt she tore, the Respondents stated that there is no realistic prospect of conviction.
There is nothing new in all these judicial fraud even on behalf of freemasonry headed by a prince, Prince Edward: the Bible states in Micah 7:3: That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievious desire: so they wrap it up.
4. As you are already aware, Parliament has stated that 48% of Crown Prosecutors are freemasons (because the God is Eternal, it can never be 100%, Alleluia). Moreover, the Cabinet Secretary has against the law (including the Freedom of Information Act 2000, Human Rights Act 1998) refused to disclose whether the Attorney General is a member of, related to or threatened by the satanic cult, the freemasons. See:
http://www.parliament.the-stationary-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm
Even the Home Secretary expressed concern about the impartiality and objectivity of the criminal justice system considering the high penetration of freemasonry. See
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm
5. Please confirm a report that the Crown Prosecution Service (i.e. the Respondents) is rife with racism even against its own staff i.e. lawyers (some of whom are freemasons). Clearly if the CPS is institutionally racist, riddled with freemasonry and clearly not fit for purpose; whereas Dr. Ovadje is black and a born-again Christian with clearly anti-satanic/masonic views that he has expressed openly (including the masons that killed his brother), then the reason of masonic fraud against him, sponsored through the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Attorney General is clear. See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm.
The Bible states in Isaiah 59:14: And judgement is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen on the street, and equity cannot enter. Yea truth faileth; and he that departeh from evil maketh himself a prey; and the LORD saw it and it displeased him that there was no judgement.
6. God has exposed the Respondents in their history of fraudulent actions against the rule of law and the laws enacted by Parliament including the Prosecution of Offences Act and Human Rights Act 1998.
Against the rule of law, the Attorney General killed off the investigation of the al-Yamamah corruption scandal by the Serious Fraud Office claiming ‘security and diplomatic interests’ i.e. in the U.K. the land of the Magna Carta, justice is no longer blind but has both eyes open looking for other interests.
Clearly, if the Attorney General can act against the rule of law and kill of a criminal investigation in another department, how much more can he act to kill off the criminal prosecution (and further investigation) into the case of Ms. D who battered and attempted to kill the Appellant on behalf of the freemasons; especially as he (the Attorney General) is the Superintendent of the Crown prosecution Service that is directly under him.
7. God has exposed the Respondents in their history of fraudulent actions against the rule of law and the laws enacted by Parliament even as the Attorney General (an appointee and friend of the Prime Minister, who sits at cabinet meetings with the Prime Minister) openly stated that he would decide whether the prime Minister would be prosecuted for the peerage-for-cash corruption scandal.
After I had filed that a notice of his statement in court as evidence of history of perversion of justice and following strong criticism from the public, the Attorney General ‘qualified’ his initial statement and stated that another lawyer (who has interests in the case) would ‘decide’ whether the prime Minister would be prosecuted but he himself (the Attorney General) would have the final give the final okay. Against the rule of law, fairness and natural justice, he refused to completely exclude himself.
8. In January 2006 when I went to file my application form for this claim and judicial review at the court office, Royal Court of Justice, the engaged in masonic practices and openly stated you cannot sue the Attorney General.
9. Accordingly, I hereby plead that the court consider the history of suppression and perversion of justice by the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service in this appeal, even as the court has refused to declare whether the court officials of judges are members of, related to or threatened by the freemasons, considering that 10% of the judges are freemasons. See:
http://www.parliament.the-stationary-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm
10. Finally and most importantly, the Bible states in Deutoronomy: And I charged your judges at that time, saying, hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgement is God’s.
A copy of this notice has been sent to various international persons, institutions world- wide.
Statement of truth
I hereby declare that the statements I have made in this notice and all its contents are true and I understand that it may be placed before the court.
Signed date: 15/12/06
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
140 St. Mary’s Road
Ilford IG1 1QY
United Kingdom.
2006/2422
Court of Appeal; Royal Court of Justice, Strand: Application for Judicial Review Case no: 2006 /2422
NOTICE TO COURT 15 December 2006
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (Appellant) v Attorney General of the United Kingdom and the Crown Prosecution Service (Respondents).
Notice of evidence that the Respondents have acted as to pervert justice on behalf of freemasonry and even on other occasions unrelated to this case.
1.Firstly, I wish to remind the court that the original application in my case is based on the fact that the freemasons (who killed my brother Ejoke Ovadje, a solicitor) sponsored Ms. D to kill me with the collusion of the Metropolitan Police and the Respondents (Lord Goldsmith the Attorney General of the U.K. and the Director of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) Sir Kenneth MacDonald).
In Nigeria, my brother ran for office on an anti-corruption platform against the corrupt interests of members of the freemasons (and its off-shoot the pyrates) who have kept 75% of the population living on less than a dollar a day amidst huge oil wealth. Earlier they had invited him to join the freemasons with a bait of winning cases before he gets to court (i.e. pervert justice) an offer he refused.
2. In February 2005, the assailant Ms. D (a co-tenant sponsored by freemasonry) repeatedly poisoned me with insecticide. I reported to the Metropolitan Police and followed it up with letters but the Metropolitan Police refused to investigate. Her husband boasted in freemasonry and openly stated: I am well connected, even if you report to the police, nothing will happen.
3.Then on 23 April 2005 (i.e. 2-3-4-5 of freemasonry akin to 9-11 of al-Queda), Ms. D battered me with more than forty blows, repeatedly bit me then threatened to and almost killed me with a six-inch blade knife pressed against the carotid artery of my neck. The Metropolitan Police was called but again (under masonic instruction) refused to investigate. The police even refused to ask for the knife that Ms. D. used to try to kill me. By the Grace of God, the evidence was so overwhelming (photographs of bites, hospital records of injuries etc.) that the case could not be suppressed.
The Respondents Lord Goldsmith the Attorney General of the U.K. and the Director of the Crown Prosecution Service then pursued a course of conduct of masonic fraud as to pervert justice and concocted a secret and fictitious ‘Ms. D’s version’ of events and corruptly refused to prosecute her despite the photographs and hospital records. Till date, they have refused to disclose that secret version of events to myself (the victim and Appellant) or to the court but corruptly claimed to have acted with the ‘rule of law’.
Against the evidence of photographs & hospital records of injuries that Ms. Draper inflicted on me, my property she destroyed and my shirt she tore, the Respondents stated that there is no realistic prospect of conviction.
There is nothing new in all these judicial fraud even on behalf of freemasonry headed by a prince, Prince Edward: the Bible states in Micah 7:3: That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievious desire: so they wrap it up.
4. As you are already aware, Parliament has stated that 48% of Crown Prosecutors are freemasons (because the God is Eternal, it can never be 100%, Alleluia). Moreover, the Cabinet Secretary has against the law (including the Freedom of Information Act 2000, Human Rights Act 1998) refused to disclose whether the Attorney General is a member of, related to or threatened by the satanic cult, the freemasons. See:
http://www.parliament.the-stationary-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm
Even the Home Secretary expressed concern about the impartiality and objectivity of the criminal justice system considering the high penetration of freemasonry. See
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm
5. Please confirm a report that the Crown Prosecution Service (i.e. the Respondents) is rife with racism even against its own staff i.e. lawyers (some of whom are freemasons). Clearly if the CPS is institutionally racist, riddled with freemasonry and clearly not fit for purpose; whereas Dr. Ovadje is black and a born-again Christian with clearly anti-satanic/masonic views that he has expressed openly (including the masons that killed his brother), then the reason of masonic fraud against him, sponsored through the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Attorney General is clear. See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm.
The Bible states in Isaiah 59:14: And judgement is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen on the street, and equity cannot enter. Yea truth faileth; and he that departeh from evil maketh himself a prey; and the LORD saw it and it displeased him that there was no judgement.
6. God has exposed the Respondents in their history of fraudulent actions against the rule of law and the laws enacted by Parliament including the Prosecution of Offences Act and Human Rights Act 1998.
Against the rule of law, the Attorney General killed off the investigation of the al-Yamamah corruption scandal by the Serious Fraud Office claiming ‘security and diplomatic interests’ i.e. in the U.K. the land of the Magna Carta, justice is no longer blind but has both eyes open looking for other interests.
Clearly, if the Attorney General can act against the rule of law and kill of a criminal investigation in another department, how much more can he act to kill off the criminal prosecution (and further investigation) into the case of Ms. D who battered and attempted to kill the Appellant on behalf of the freemasons; especially as he (the Attorney General) is the Superintendent of the Crown prosecution Service that is directly under him.
7. God has exposed the Respondents in their history of fraudulent actions against the rule of law and the laws enacted by Parliament even as the Attorney General (an appointee and friend of the Prime Minister, who sits at cabinet meetings with the Prime Minister) openly stated that he would decide whether the prime Minister would be prosecuted for the peerage-for-cash corruption scandal.
After I had filed that a notice of his statement in court as evidence of history of perversion of justice and following strong criticism from the public, the Attorney General ‘qualified’ his initial statement and stated that another lawyer (who has interests in the case) would ‘decide’ whether the prime Minister would be prosecuted but he himself (the Attorney General) would have the final give the final okay. Against the rule of law, fairness and natural justice, he refused to completely exclude himself.
8. In January 2006 when I went to file my application form for this claim and judicial review at the court office, Royal Court of Justice, the engaged in masonic practices and openly stated you cannot sue the Attorney General.
9. Accordingly, I hereby plead that the court consider the history of suppression and perversion of justice by the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service in this appeal, even as the court has refused to declare whether the court officials of judges are members of, related to or threatened by the freemasons, considering that 10% of the judges are freemasons. See:
http://www.parliament.the-stationary-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm
10. Finally and most importantly, the Bible states in Deutoronomy: And I charged your judges at that time, saying, hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgement is God’s.
A copy of this notice has been sent to various international persons, institutions world- wide.
Statement of truth
I hereby declare that the statements I have made in this notice and all its contents are true and I understand that it may be placed before the court.
Signed date: 15/12/06
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
140 St. Mary’s Road
Ilford IG1 1QY
United Kingdom.
posted by jato | 4:27 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home