WILL the freemasons plan another attack?
Royal Court of Justice, Strand. Case no: HQ06X00636:
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)
Notice to the court: warning of possible unlawful acts of the Defendants.:
The Claimant hereby notifies the court of the following.
1. In Nigeria, the satanic cult the freemasons and its offshoot the pyrates confraternity, murdered Ejoke Ovadje (beloved brother of the Claimant). They shot him in the carotid artery of his neck, just a stone throw from the court premises.
He was a solicitor. His crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the interests of members of these cults.
The Nigerian Police (under the direction of these cults) refused to investigate.
2. That in February 2005, the Claimant lived in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford. Another tenant Ms. D (on behalf of the freemasons) repeatedly poisoned the Claimant.
The Claimant reported the case at Ilford police station and followed up with letters. The Defendants refused to investigate.
Clearly, Ms. Draper acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.
Ms. D husband had previously boasted even if you report to the police nothing will happen.
3 On 23 April 2005 (a freemasonic-planned day of evil i.e. 23-4-5, akin to 9-11 of al-Queda), Ms. D (sponsored by the freemasons) battered the Claimant with more than forty blows, repeatedly bit him, and threatened and almost killed him with a six-inch blade knife that she pressed against the carotid artery of his neck, just like the Nigerian freemasons killed his brother.
Like the Nigeria Police (in the case of the murder of Ejoke Ovadje), the Defendants (the premier U.K. Police) refused to investigate these heinous crimes against the Claimant. They even refused to ask for or search for the knife or take any evidence because it was a Saturday night.
Clearly, Ms. D acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.
4. In July 2005, at the same Courtland Avenue, the Defendants sponsored Mr. C (another tenant) to assault the Claimant. The intention was clear, to use Carl’s assault to muddle the case against Ms. D and cover up their corrupt actions. They acted to present Ms. D assault, battery & attempted murder as a ‘community relations issue’. See pages 113-116. But God exposed the wiles of the Defendants.
5. The same Defendants repeatedly kidnapped (falsely arrested) the Claimant and unlawfully imprisoned (detained) him fourteen times. On 19 April 2006, the Defendants imprisoned the Claimant at New Scotland Yard for the ‘crime’ of attempting to serve the Defendants with court papers of this claim.
The Defendant’s intent was clear: they repeatedly kidnapped (unlawfully arrested) & imprisoned the Claimant so as to ‘reduce’ the impact of their unlawful and evil actions and to ‘overload’ the Claimant with fourteen claims all on the same issue; just like in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.
6. ‘Out of the blue’ the Claimant was evicted from his home at the beginning of this winter. God in His Infinite Grace (unmerited favour) prevented the Claimant from being rendered homeless in winter; He provided rented accommodation and delayed the cold weather until the Claimant had packed to his new residence, a house-share.
7. Following the Defendants track record of repeating crimes in order to muddle issues, the Claimant knows it is possible that the Defendants will organise another ‘Ms. D’ (in this new house-share) so as to muddle issues in court and to present a ‘community relations issue’ regarding the Claimant.
For the record:
(a)The Claimant has been entirely reserved with the co-tenants whether male or female, whether white, black or green.
(b) Whereas the co-tenants seem good people, knowing the track record of the Defendants, the Claimant has opted for caution and is as formal as possible. He has said the occasional hello and the occasional very brief talk only on God (and no other issue) with one or two male tenants.
(c)There can be no question of the Claimant entering another tenant’s room or vice versa, whether male or female, whether white, black or blue.
(d) The house is just a stone throw from the court, just as the spot where Ejoke Ovadje (the Claimants brother) was killed, in Nigeria. Ms. D (under sponsorship) battered and almost murdered the Claimant at ‘Courtland’ Avenue.
(e) At the Claimants last residence (his own home), the freemasons organised the electricity company to cut off supply in winter, even though the Claimant was not owing a penny. They kept the Claimant in darkness for two months without electricity even though they knew the heating depended on electricity, confirming the Bible in Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Thank God for Col 2:10: Ye are complete in Christ Who is the Head of all principalities and powers.
(e) If the Defendants plan any evil against the Claimant, God will foil such plans even as the Bible states in Isaiah 54:17: Behold they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake. No weapon fashioned against thee shall prosper and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.
(f) The Claimant has NO intention of calling the police (the Defendants) UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, even if (God forbid) a tenant or any other sponsored assailant points a gun at him. The assailant will have to call the Defendants by himself (herself) after God destroys such evil attack.
(g) The Claimant hereby states that his trust is in God (not because he is holy, but because of God’s Mercy) even as the Bible states in Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.
Statement of truth
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)
I hereby declare that the statements I have made in this notice and all its contents are true and I understand that it may be placed before the court.
Signed date: 13/11/06
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)
Notice to the court: warning of possible unlawful acts of the Defendants.:
The Claimant hereby notifies the court of the following.
1. In Nigeria, the satanic cult the freemasons and its offshoot the pyrates confraternity, murdered Ejoke Ovadje (beloved brother of the Claimant). They shot him in the carotid artery of his neck, just a stone throw from the court premises.
He was a solicitor. His crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the interests of members of these cults.
The Nigerian Police (under the direction of these cults) refused to investigate.
2. That in February 2005, the Claimant lived in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford. Another tenant Ms. D (on behalf of the freemasons) repeatedly poisoned the Claimant.
The Claimant reported the case at Ilford police station and followed up with letters. The Defendants refused to investigate.
Clearly, Ms. Draper acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.
Ms. D husband had previously boasted even if you report to the police nothing will happen.
3 On 23 April 2005 (a freemasonic-planned day of evil i.e. 23-4-5, akin to 9-11 of al-Queda), Ms. D (sponsored by the freemasons) battered the Claimant with more than forty blows, repeatedly bit him, and threatened and almost killed him with a six-inch blade knife that she pressed against the carotid artery of his neck, just like the Nigerian freemasons killed his brother.
Like the Nigeria Police (in the case of the murder of Ejoke Ovadje), the Defendants (the premier U.K. Police) refused to investigate these heinous crimes against the Claimant. They even refused to ask for or search for the knife or take any evidence because it was a Saturday night.
Clearly, Ms. D acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.
4. In July 2005, at the same Courtland Avenue, the Defendants sponsored Mr. C (another tenant) to assault the Claimant. The intention was clear, to use Carl’s assault to muddle the case against Ms. D and cover up their corrupt actions. They acted to present Ms. D assault, battery & attempted murder as a ‘community relations issue’. See pages 113-116. But God exposed the wiles of the Defendants.
5. The same Defendants repeatedly kidnapped (falsely arrested) the Claimant and unlawfully imprisoned (detained) him fourteen times. On 19 April 2006, the Defendants imprisoned the Claimant at New Scotland Yard for the ‘crime’ of attempting to serve the Defendants with court papers of this claim.
The Defendant’s intent was clear: they repeatedly kidnapped (unlawfully arrested) & imprisoned the Claimant so as to ‘reduce’ the impact of their unlawful and evil actions and to ‘overload’ the Claimant with fourteen claims all on the same issue; just like in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.
6. ‘Out of the blue’ the Claimant was evicted from his home at the beginning of this winter. God in His Infinite Grace (unmerited favour) prevented the Claimant from being rendered homeless in winter; He provided rented accommodation and delayed the cold weather until the Claimant had packed to his new residence, a house-share.
7. Following the Defendants track record of repeating crimes in order to muddle issues, the Claimant knows it is possible that the Defendants will organise another ‘Ms. D’ (in this new house-share) so as to muddle issues in court and to present a ‘community relations issue’ regarding the Claimant.
For the record:
(a)The Claimant has been entirely reserved with the co-tenants whether male or female, whether white, black or green.
(b) Whereas the co-tenants seem good people, knowing the track record of the Defendants, the Claimant has opted for caution and is as formal as possible. He has said the occasional hello and the occasional very brief talk only on God (and no other issue) with one or two male tenants.
(c)There can be no question of the Claimant entering another tenant’s room or vice versa, whether male or female, whether white, black or blue.
(d) The house is just a stone throw from the court, just as the spot where Ejoke Ovadje (the Claimants brother) was killed, in Nigeria. Ms. D (under sponsorship) battered and almost murdered the Claimant at ‘Courtland’ Avenue.
(e) At the Claimants last residence (his own home), the freemasons organised the electricity company to cut off supply in winter, even though the Claimant was not owing a penny. They kept the Claimant in darkness for two months without electricity even though they knew the heating depended on electricity, confirming the Bible in Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Thank God for Col 2:10: Ye are complete in Christ Who is the Head of all principalities and powers.
(e) If the Defendants plan any evil against the Claimant, God will foil such plans even as the Bible states in Isaiah 54:17: Behold they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake. No weapon fashioned against thee shall prosper and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.
(f) The Claimant has NO intention of calling the police (the Defendants) UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, even if (God forbid) a tenant or any other sponsored assailant points a gun at him. The assailant will have to call the Defendants by himself (herself) after God destroys such evil attack.
(g) The Claimant hereby states that his trust is in God (not because he is holy, but because of God’s Mercy) even as the Bible states in Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.
Statement of truth
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)
I hereby declare that the statements I have made in this notice and all its contents are true and I understand that it may be placed before the court.
Signed date: 13/11/06
posted by jato | 2:08 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home