You are invited to hearing on 09 November 2006
Application for Judicial Review; Royal Court of Justice, Strand:
Case no: CO/765/06
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje v Attorney General of the United Kingdom and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Dear Sir/ Madam, You are invited to the hearing of the above case on Thursday 09 November 2006 (9-11) at 11:30 am.
Come and see whether the rule of law exists in the U.K or freemasonic corruption will triumph.
1.In February 2005, Dr. Ovadje rented accommodation in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford..
In February 2005 Ms. D (one of the tenants, a married woman) repeatedly poisoned Dr. Ovadje with insecticide and he became breathless. He reported to the Metropolitan Police. Unfortunately the police refused to investigate even though his life was clearly threatened.
Ms. Draper was sponsored by the freemasons to kill Dr. Ovadje.
2. On 23/04/05 Ms. S D for no just cause burst into Dr. Ovadje’s room and battered him with more than forty blows and repeatedly bit him. Then she threatened to kill Dr. Ovadje and almost killed him as she pressed the tip of a six-inch bladed knife against the carotid artery of his neck. She committed at least 15 offences against the person. Again, the Metropolitan Police refused to investigate these heinous crimes because it was on a Saturday night.
Ms. D was sponsored by the freemasons to kill Dr. Ovadje on a memorable 23-4-5 akin to 9-11 of al-Queda. Prior to 23/04/05, on an occasion when Ms. Draper harassed Dr. Ovadje, her husband had boasted that if Dr. Ovadje reported any matter to the police, nothing would happen because they are connected.
But the evidence was so glaring that even the corrupt masonic actions of the police could not destroy the evidence:
(a)Ms. S. D. destroyed many things in Dr. Ovadje’s room as witnessed by police
(b)Ms. S. D. tore Dr. Ovadje’s shirt that he wore on the night she battered him and almost killed him. Dr. Ovadje gave the shirt to the police as evidence.
(c) Ms. S. D. severely beat (more than forty blows) and repeatedly bit Dr. Ovadje that night. The policemen saw his injuries. The hospital where he received treatment, recorded the injuries. (d) There are photographs of the bites Ms. S. D. inflicted on Dr. Ovadje.
(e) The Crown Prosecution Service in a letter to Dr. Ovadje dated 01/12/05, confirmed that the Metropolitan Police saw the injuries Ms. D. inflicted on Dr. Ovadje’s body.
3. Dr. Ovadje complained to the Attorney General (Lord Goldsmith) and requested him (A.G.) to advise the police to do a better job. Against the law including the Human Rights Act 1998 and Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, the Attorney General corruptly refused to take an action.
4. Against all the abundant evidence, the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service corruptly and maliciously refused to prosecute Ms. D. for any of the at least fifteen criminal offences she committed against Dr. Ovadje despite the overwhelming evidence e.g. assault, battery and bodily harm backed by photographs, hospital record and even the C.P.S. own confirmation that the police saw the injuries. See Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
5. Worse, the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service colluded with Ms. D. (who battered and almost killed Dr. Ovadje) to concoct a ‘secret and fictitious Ms. Draper’s version of events’ and refused to release the ‘secret and Ms. Draper’s version of events’.
Then they falsely presented a false and vague allegation that Dr. Ovadje, the victim, had acted against Ms. D. in a yet to be specified way. The action of the Defendants confirmed Ms. Draper’s husband’s boast: even if you report to the police, nothing would happen because they are connected (as freemasons and otherwise).
6. A court official at the Royal Court of Justice Strand (the headquarters of the U.K. judiciary) whilst performing masonic rituals in the afternoon physically tried to prevent Dr. Ovadje filing this claim saying 'you cannot sue the Attorney General'.
7. Agents of the Defendants in a mafiosi-like action removed a book titled ‘Human Rights Practice’ which is the authority on Human Rights Law (the basis for Dr. Ovadje’s case against the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service) from the reference section of Redbridge Library (books from the reference section cannot be borrowed). Dr. Ovadje had been relying on the book to prepare the Grounds for judicial review and cases to cite.
The library staff acknowledged the disappearance of the book but refused to report it to the police, thus confirming that they were in the know of the masonic disappearance.
8. The court has corruptly refused to determine any of the applications made by Dr. Ovadje including:
(a)that the court declare that the judge and court officials handling this application are not freemasons. The reason being that the basis of this case is that the freemasons sponsored Ms. Draper to kill Dr. Ovadje.
Moreover, parliament and the Home Secretary have already expressed serious concern at the number of judges (10%) and magistrates (20%) and Crown Prosecutors (48%) are freemasons and its effect on justice i.e. justice must not only be done but be seen to be done.
See: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm)
The Home Secretary Jack stated that new judges should declare membership of freemasonry, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm
The C.P.S. is riddled with racism, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm
The Cabinet Secretary has against the law (Freedom of Information Act) refused to confirm the members of the cabinet including the Attorney General that are freemasons.
If the Attorney General and Crown Prosecutors that corruptly refused to prosecute Ms. D. are freemasons and if the judge and court officers are also freemasons, then it is clear that there can be no justice.
(b) that the court should determine Dr. Ovadje’s application without a hearing even though this is his legal right even as indicated in form N244, see Human Rights Act 1998 and CPR. The obvious conclusion is with a written determination reduces cheating. With an oral hearing, the judge can claim after hearing the Claimant……..
9. The court has corruptly (against the Administrative court rules) refused Dr. Ovadje to submit his skeletal arguments. The rules state that the court would notify Dr. Ovadje to submit his skeletal arguments; but the court never did but proceeded to determine the application without the skeletal arguments so that fraud may be perpetrated.
Judicial fraud is not new, even on behalf of the freemasons head by a prince, Prince Edward. The Bible states in Micah 7:3: That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.
10. The terrorist and satanic organisation, the freemasons, in Nigeria murdered Dr. Ovadje’s brother, Ejoke Ovadje. Ejoke Ovadje was a solicitor in Nigeria. He had earlier been invited to join the freemasons with a bait of winning cases before he gets to court, an offer he refused. Clearly judicial fraud is part and parcel of freemasonry.
His (Ejoke’s) crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the corrupt interests of satanic and masonic elite that loot the oil funds whilst 250, 000 Nigerian children die of malnutrition and poverty related diseases every year and 75% of the population live on less than a dollar a day. He was warned that his lives of freemasons are guaranteed in politics.
This satanic masonic elite murdered at least 10,000 people to ‘win’ the last elections. Not surprisingly, Mr. Jack Straw then Foreign Secretary was the first to congratulate the murderous Nigerian Government. In return, other oil companies are discouraged from the Nigerian oil industry apart from Shell. It is obvious that comparatively, Mugabe is a saint.
11. In London U.K. in 2000, Dr. Ovadje refused to be a ‘dog’, a pyrate (an offshoot of the freemasons). God foiled the attempt of the freemasons and pyrates to murder him in London in 2000. It is therefore not surprising that the freemasons sponsored Ms. Draper to kill Dr. Ovadje whilst ‘guaranteeing her protection using the instruments of the state i.e. the Attorney General and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Moreover, Dr. Ovadje has openly and legally campaigned against the freemasons for murdering his brother, even at Trafalgar Square.
Come and see whether there is rule of law in the U.K. or if anarchy and masonic law (and judicial fraud) will triumph.
Come to the venue: Administrative Court, Royal Court of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL, time 11:30 am on 9 November 2006.
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
140 St. Mary’s Road
Ilford
IG1 1QY.
Case no: CO/765/06
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje v Attorney General of the United Kingdom and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Dear Sir/ Madam, You are invited to the hearing of the above case on Thursday 09 November 2006 (9-11) at 11:30 am.
Come and see whether the rule of law exists in the U.K or freemasonic corruption will triumph.
1.In February 2005, Dr. Ovadje rented accommodation in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford..
In February 2005 Ms. D (one of the tenants, a married woman) repeatedly poisoned Dr. Ovadje with insecticide and he became breathless. He reported to the Metropolitan Police. Unfortunately the police refused to investigate even though his life was clearly threatened.
Ms. Draper was sponsored by the freemasons to kill Dr. Ovadje.
2. On 23/04/05 Ms. S D for no just cause burst into Dr. Ovadje’s room and battered him with more than forty blows and repeatedly bit him. Then she threatened to kill Dr. Ovadje and almost killed him as she pressed the tip of a six-inch bladed knife against the carotid artery of his neck. She committed at least 15 offences against the person. Again, the Metropolitan Police refused to investigate these heinous crimes because it was on a Saturday night.
Ms. D was sponsored by the freemasons to kill Dr. Ovadje on a memorable 23-4-5 akin to 9-11 of al-Queda. Prior to 23/04/05, on an occasion when Ms. Draper harassed Dr. Ovadje, her husband had boasted that if Dr. Ovadje reported any matter to the police, nothing would happen because they are connected.
But the evidence was so glaring that even the corrupt masonic actions of the police could not destroy the evidence:
(a)Ms. S. D. destroyed many things in Dr. Ovadje’s room as witnessed by police
(b)Ms. S. D. tore Dr. Ovadje’s shirt that he wore on the night she battered him and almost killed him. Dr. Ovadje gave the shirt to the police as evidence.
(c) Ms. S. D. severely beat (more than forty blows) and repeatedly bit Dr. Ovadje that night. The policemen saw his injuries. The hospital where he received treatment, recorded the injuries. (d) There are photographs of the bites Ms. S. D. inflicted on Dr. Ovadje.
(e) The Crown Prosecution Service in a letter to Dr. Ovadje dated 01/12/05, confirmed that the Metropolitan Police saw the injuries Ms. D. inflicted on Dr. Ovadje’s body.
3. Dr. Ovadje complained to the Attorney General (Lord Goldsmith) and requested him (A.G.) to advise the police to do a better job. Against the law including the Human Rights Act 1998 and Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, the Attorney General corruptly refused to take an action.
4. Against all the abundant evidence, the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service corruptly and maliciously refused to prosecute Ms. D. for any of the at least fifteen criminal offences she committed against Dr. Ovadje despite the overwhelming evidence e.g. assault, battery and bodily harm backed by photographs, hospital record and even the C.P.S. own confirmation that the police saw the injuries. See Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
5. Worse, the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service colluded with Ms. D. (who battered and almost killed Dr. Ovadje) to concoct a ‘secret and fictitious Ms. Draper’s version of events’ and refused to release the ‘secret and Ms. Draper’s version of events’.
Then they falsely presented a false and vague allegation that Dr. Ovadje, the victim, had acted against Ms. D. in a yet to be specified way. The action of the Defendants confirmed Ms. Draper’s husband’s boast: even if you report to the police, nothing would happen because they are connected (as freemasons and otherwise).
6. A court official at the Royal Court of Justice Strand (the headquarters of the U.K. judiciary) whilst performing masonic rituals in the afternoon physically tried to prevent Dr. Ovadje filing this claim saying 'you cannot sue the Attorney General'.
7. Agents of the Defendants in a mafiosi-like action removed a book titled ‘Human Rights Practice’ which is the authority on Human Rights Law (the basis for Dr. Ovadje’s case against the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service) from the reference section of Redbridge Library (books from the reference section cannot be borrowed). Dr. Ovadje had been relying on the book to prepare the Grounds for judicial review and cases to cite.
The library staff acknowledged the disappearance of the book but refused to report it to the police, thus confirming that they were in the know of the masonic disappearance.
8. The court has corruptly refused to determine any of the applications made by Dr. Ovadje including:
(a)that the court declare that the judge and court officials handling this application are not freemasons. The reason being that the basis of this case is that the freemasons sponsored Ms. Draper to kill Dr. Ovadje.
Moreover, parliament and the Home Secretary have already expressed serious concern at the number of judges (10%) and magistrates (20%) and Crown Prosecutors (48%) are freemasons and its effect on justice i.e. justice must not only be done but be seen to be done.
See: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm)
The Home Secretary Jack stated that new judges should declare membership of freemasonry, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm
The C.P.S. is riddled with racism, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm
The Cabinet Secretary has against the law (Freedom of Information Act) refused to confirm the members of the cabinet including the Attorney General that are freemasons.
If the Attorney General and Crown Prosecutors that corruptly refused to prosecute Ms. D. are freemasons and if the judge and court officers are also freemasons, then it is clear that there can be no justice.
(b) that the court should determine Dr. Ovadje’s application without a hearing even though this is his legal right even as indicated in form N244, see Human Rights Act 1998 and CPR. The obvious conclusion is with a written determination reduces cheating. With an oral hearing, the judge can claim after hearing the Claimant……..
9. The court has corruptly (against the Administrative court rules) refused Dr. Ovadje to submit his skeletal arguments. The rules state that the court would notify Dr. Ovadje to submit his skeletal arguments; but the court never did but proceeded to determine the application without the skeletal arguments so that fraud may be perpetrated.
Judicial fraud is not new, even on behalf of the freemasons head by a prince, Prince Edward. The Bible states in Micah 7:3: That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.
10. The terrorist and satanic organisation, the freemasons, in Nigeria murdered Dr. Ovadje’s brother, Ejoke Ovadje. Ejoke Ovadje was a solicitor in Nigeria. He had earlier been invited to join the freemasons with a bait of winning cases before he gets to court, an offer he refused. Clearly judicial fraud is part and parcel of freemasonry.
His (Ejoke’s) crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the corrupt interests of satanic and masonic elite that loot the oil funds whilst 250, 000 Nigerian children die of malnutrition and poverty related diseases every year and 75% of the population live on less than a dollar a day. He was warned that his lives of freemasons are guaranteed in politics.
This satanic masonic elite murdered at least 10,000 people to ‘win’ the last elections. Not surprisingly, Mr. Jack Straw then Foreign Secretary was the first to congratulate the murderous Nigerian Government. In return, other oil companies are discouraged from the Nigerian oil industry apart from Shell. It is obvious that comparatively, Mugabe is a saint.
11. In London U.K. in 2000, Dr. Ovadje refused to be a ‘dog’, a pyrate (an offshoot of the freemasons). God foiled the attempt of the freemasons and pyrates to murder him in London in 2000. It is therefore not surprising that the freemasons sponsored Ms. Draper to kill Dr. Ovadje whilst ‘guaranteeing her protection using the instruments of the state i.e. the Attorney General and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Moreover, Dr. Ovadje has openly and legally campaigned against the freemasons for murdering his brother, even at Trafalgar Square.
Come and see whether there is rule of law in the U.K. or if anarchy and masonic law (and judicial fraud) will triumph.
Come to the venue: Administrative Court, Royal Court of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL, time 11:30 am on 9 November 2006.
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
140 St. Mary’s Road
Ilford
IG1 1QY.
posted by jato | 2:08 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home