Royal court of Justice U.K. blocks claim against police on behalf of freemasonry
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
21 September 2006
Lord Phillips
Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales
Royal Court of Justice at the Strand, London WC2A 2LL & Chair: Office of Judicial Complaints, 4th Floor, Petty France, London SW1H 9HD
Dear Sir: Royal Court of Justice, Strand. Case no: HQ06X00636: Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner: Court has unlawfully blocked the claim.
1.A brief summary of the case is as follows: On 23/04/05 Ms. Sarah Draper for no just cause burst into Dr. Ovadje’s room and battered him with more than forty blows. She threatened to and almost killed him as she pressed the tip of a six-inch bladed knife against the carotid artery of his neck. She committed at least 15 offences against the person of the claimant. The Metropolitan Police of London refused to investigate, not even to ask for the assault weapon, the knife. In February 2005, she had repeatedly poisoned Dr. Ovadje with insecticide, an offence that he reported and wrote to the Metropolitan Police but the defendants refused to investigate or disclose a word till date.
On an earlier occasion when Ms. Draper and her family harassed Dr. Ovadje, her husband had boated of connections (with the backing of freemasonry) that even if you report to the police nothing will happen.
2. On 19/04/06, I went to New Scotland Yard (direct from the Court Office at the Royal Court of Justice, Strand) to serve the Metropolitan Police with court papers for this claim against them. The police kidnapped me (knowingly & unlawfully arrested me) for trying to serve legal papers, imprisoned me in their van and drove to near Belgravia station. They stated ‘you are de-arrested, go home.’
I went to the nearest post office and sent the served the defendants by first class post according to law. I returned to the Royal Court of Justice and submitted the Certificate of Service, showing deemed service was on 21 April 2006.
The defendants initially lied that they had received service on 03 May 2006. I believe this was intentional: to fraudulently beat the one-year limit for claims under the Human Rights Act 1998. (which was 23 April 2006). Please refer to the letter from the defendants and post office proof that I have already sent to you.
3. The defendants failed to file a defence within the 28 days allowed by law. In accordance with the law, I filed a Request for Default judgement. Against the law, the court has corruptly refused to send me the default judgement till date, even as the CPR is quite clear that I met the positive and negative obligations of the law (see my bundle to you on default judgement).
4. Without the law, the court then unlawfully and corruptly extended the time for the defendants to file a defence by three months.
5. The defence then (unlawfully) filed their statement of case. The rest was for the case to be allocated for hearing.
On the 21 August 2006, I filed an allocation questionnaire at the Royal Court of Justice, Strand. I stated in the Allocation Questionnaire that amongst the witnesses I intend to call is Prince Edward, Grandmaster of the freemasons. Additionally, I stated that the court should confirm in writing that the judge and court officials handling this claim are not freemasons (See Human Rights Act 1998 including access to justice, fair trial and impartial tribunal).
6. I sent a letter dated 04 September 2006 to the court requesting disclosure whether the judge and court officials are freemasons (attached).
7. On 05 September 2006, I was served with an unsigned ‘order’ of the court, copy enclosed. This order blocks my claim, contrary to law.
Clearly this is not a judicial function of the court as there was no hearing held and the defendants did not apply for this order. The case had not even been allocated.
We operate an adversarial system in the U.K. The defendants were able to (unlawfully) file a defence (out of time) based on my statement of case. For the court officials (not the judge as the case has not been allocated) to without a hearing or application by the defendants, and without an allocated judge, corruptly read my claim in secret and to block me from filing a claim simply because the official thinks that Prince Edward (Grandmaster of the freemasons) is above the law is so criminal and unlawful that it is incurable bad.
Even the reasons for these corrupt actions are so bad that I am embarrassed. The BCCI v Bank of England case had more than tens of thousands of pages and the court heard them. For the court official to state that the 50 pages in my statement of case (that states all the human rights violations) is too much for a trial, is unbelievable.
Furthermore, the court is now the solicitor and advocating for the defence, even before trial. My statement of case is well numbered and paginated even with an introductory page listing every document that everyone can see it. I know that my statement of case will stand scrutiny anywhere in the world. Legally, it is for a judge to comment and decide at the hearing not for a court official in secret when the case has not even been allocated. If my case is bad, then clearly it will fail on points of law at the hearing. Everyone is supposed to prove his case at the hearing.
Clearly, as the defendants were able and happy to file their defence (unlawfully out of time) based on my statement of case, the court is now crying more than the bereaved. The court fraudulently acted to block the hearing.
Worse still, unlike in my casethe court has not asked the defendants to state any details of communication or event, the date, place events etc. For example, my landlady Mrs. Virk witnessed Ms. Draper battering me on 23/04/05. Even in July 2006, she confirmed that the police never interviewed her whereas the police have stated in their defence that the evidence of the ‘witnesses’ supported Ms. Draper. Why has the court (in secret) decided to leave the defence to prove their case at the trial but block my claim before trial (in order to corruptly protect freemasonry) whereas I have already detailed all the events in my cbundle including numerous letters?. Where is the equality of arms even in secret court perusal and orders?
8. With all respects Sir, the integrity of the judiciary is at stake here. Judicial corruption and indeed the criminal justice system is not new, as the Bible has already stated (even on behalf of freemasons headed by the prince, Prince Edward) in Micah 7:3:
That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.
I have already sent you evidence from the following websites showing the level:
(1) 48% of the lawyers in the lawyers Crown Prosecution Service are freemasons; see: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm)
(2) 10% of judges and 20% magistrates are freemasons (generally accepted a gross understatement); see: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm.
(3) Home Secretary Jack Straw stated that new judges should declare membership of freemasonry: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm
(4) The C.P.S. is riddled with racism (see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm).
(5) The police is overwhelmed by freemasonry.
9. With all respect Sir, I hereby assert that in accordance with my human rights as guaranteed by the Human Rights Act of 1998, including right to a fair trial, right to remedy, right to not be discriminated against and other provisions in the law, I hereby request again, that you investigate the cases of judicial fraud as detailed in my letter and the attached documents.
With all respect Sir, I hereby remind you that as a public authority of the United Kingdom, you have a duty to conduct an effective investigation into repeated judicial fraud against my person and depriving me of my human rights. I have exceeded the legal requirement i.e. merely to show that arguably, the Court has violated my rights: with specific details of fraud, clearly obvious even at a glance. See Klass v Republic of Germany A 28 (1978), 2 EHRR 214, ECtHR, para 64. From that moment Sir, you are legally compelled to investigate effectively and ensure the prosecution of the offenders and ensure my receipt of justice. See Human Rights Act 1998; Silver v U.K. (1983) 5 EHRR 347, ECtHR; Aydin v Turkey (1997) 25 EHRR 251, 1997-VI 1889; and Assenov v Bulgaria (28 October 1998 unreported), ECtHR.
10. I feel it is unfortunate that while we criticise other countries for human rights violations e.g. Turkey, there is so much violation of human rights even in the judiciary in the U.K especially on behalf of freemasonry. The Bible in Isaiah 59:14-15 says: And judgement is turned away backwards and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen on the street and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey: And the Lord saw it and it displeased Him that there was no judgement.
11. Sir, I believe you are the head of the judiciary so the buck stops at your table whether at the Royal Court of Justice or at the Office of Judicial Complaints. Sir, like I stated before, the judiciary is on trial here; if you do not act it means you have declared the judiciary not fit for purpose. With all respect, God will act, and you would have lost an opportunity to be counted amongst reformers, those who really believe in the rule of law and not judicial fraud and anarchy as sponsored by the freemasons. For the Bible states in Psalm 103:6 states: The LORD executeth righteousness and judgement for all that are oppressed.
With all humility, I hereby state that the former Home Secretary Mr. Charles Clarke left me a foreigner (God forbid, supposedly prisoner) to the freemasons. He left office because of foreign prisoners. Last year I did inform the Prime Minister that he tackle freemasonry or God would remove him from office like King Nebuchadnedezzar in the Bible, who ate grass (the modern equivalent is lame duck). You are a witness to the events that have unfolded. I am not rejoicing at the discomfort of others, neither am I declaring myself holy (only God is Holy) but stating that God will always give victory to Israel, those who call upon His Name.
Please investigate the case of judicial fraud against me, even by the court at the headquarters of the judiciary: the Royal Court of Justice Strand. When the court begins to state that a person (Prince Edward) is above the law and because of that, the court unlawfully and corruptly seeks to destroy the judiciary, the court is sponsoring anarchy to replace the rule of law. Is it any surprise that youths no longer vote and now resort to terrorism, believing that the system is extremely corrupt and will not provide remedy.
In my previous complaint to you, I made an affidavit of judicial corruption by judges in the County Court. Unfortunately, you refused to investigate. If my claims are untrue, please prosecute me for perjury.
12. I believe there is a satanic plan to flood me with judicial fraud in order to overwhelm me so that I will give up, even as the Bible states Like death, the wicked are never satisfied. I trust in the Word of God that states in Isaiah 54: Behold they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake. No weapon that is fashioned against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgement, thou shalt condemn.
I have sent with this letter and evidence to your offices both at the Royal court of Justice Strand and your office at the Office of Judicial Complaints. and copies to interested international persons and bodies.
13. I leave you with Deuteronomy 1:16: And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. Ye shall not respect persons in judgement; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of man; for the judgment is God’s. You can see that the judgement is God’s not mine, and any judicial fraud is against God.
May God bless you with strength and courage. Amen.
Many thanks.. Sincerely,
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
126 CHADWELL HEATH LANE • ROMFORD, ESSEX • RM6 4AE
UNITED KINGDOM
21 September 2006
Lord Phillips
Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales
Royal Court of Justice at the Strand, London WC2A 2LL & Chair: Office of Judicial Complaints, 4th Floor, Petty France, London SW1H 9HD
Dear Sir: Royal Court of Justice, Strand. Case no: HQ06X00636: Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner: Court has unlawfully blocked the claim.
1.A brief summary of the case is as follows: On 23/04/05 Ms. Sarah Draper for no just cause burst into Dr. Ovadje’s room and battered him with more than forty blows. She threatened to and almost killed him as she pressed the tip of a six-inch bladed knife against the carotid artery of his neck. She committed at least 15 offences against the person of the claimant. The Metropolitan Police of London refused to investigate, not even to ask for the assault weapon, the knife. In February 2005, she had repeatedly poisoned Dr. Ovadje with insecticide, an offence that he reported and wrote to the Metropolitan Police but the defendants refused to investigate or disclose a word till date.
On an earlier occasion when Ms. Draper and her family harassed Dr. Ovadje, her husband had boated of connections (with the backing of freemasonry) that even if you report to the police nothing will happen.
2. On 19/04/06, I went to New Scotland Yard (direct from the Court Office at the Royal Court of Justice, Strand) to serve the Metropolitan Police with court papers for this claim against them. The police kidnapped me (knowingly & unlawfully arrested me) for trying to serve legal papers, imprisoned me in their van and drove to near Belgravia station. They stated ‘you are de-arrested, go home.’
I went to the nearest post office and sent the served the defendants by first class post according to law. I returned to the Royal Court of Justice and submitted the Certificate of Service, showing deemed service was on 21 April 2006.
The defendants initially lied that they had received service on 03 May 2006. I believe this was intentional: to fraudulently beat the one-year limit for claims under the Human Rights Act 1998. (which was 23 April 2006). Please refer to the letter from the defendants and post office proof that I have already sent to you.
3. The defendants failed to file a defence within the 28 days allowed by law. In accordance with the law, I filed a Request for Default judgement. Against the law, the court has corruptly refused to send me the default judgement till date, even as the CPR is quite clear that I met the positive and negative obligations of the law (see my bundle to you on default judgement).
4. Without the law, the court then unlawfully and corruptly extended the time for the defendants to file a defence by three months.
5. The defence then (unlawfully) filed their statement of case. The rest was for the case to be allocated for hearing.
On the 21 August 2006, I filed an allocation questionnaire at the Royal Court of Justice, Strand. I stated in the Allocation Questionnaire that amongst the witnesses I intend to call is Prince Edward, Grandmaster of the freemasons. Additionally, I stated that the court should confirm in writing that the judge and court officials handling this claim are not freemasons (See Human Rights Act 1998 including access to justice, fair trial and impartial tribunal).
6. I sent a letter dated 04 September 2006 to the court requesting disclosure whether the judge and court officials are freemasons (attached).
7. On 05 September 2006, I was served with an unsigned ‘order’ of the court, copy enclosed. This order blocks my claim, contrary to law.
Clearly this is not a judicial function of the court as there was no hearing held and the defendants did not apply for this order. The case had not even been allocated.
We operate an adversarial system in the U.K. The defendants were able to (unlawfully) file a defence (out of time) based on my statement of case. For the court officials (not the judge as the case has not been allocated) to without a hearing or application by the defendants, and without an allocated judge, corruptly read my claim in secret and to block me from filing a claim simply because the official thinks that Prince Edward (Grandmaster of the freemasons) is above the law is so criminal and unlawful that it is incurable bad.
Even the reasons for these corrupt actions are so bad that I am embarrassed. The BCCI v Bank of England case had more than tens of thousands of pages and the court heard them. For the court official to state that the 50 pages in my statement of case (that states all the human rights violations) is too much for a trial, is unbelievable.
Furthermore, the court is now the solicitor and advocating for the defence, even before trial. My statement of case is well numbered and paginated even with an introductory page listing every document that everyone can see it. I know that my statement of case will stand scrutiny anywhere in the world. Legally, it is for a judge to comment and decide at the hearing not for a court official in secret when the case has not even been allocated. If my case is bad, then clearly it will fail on points of law at the hearing. Everyone is supposed to prove his case at the hearing.
Clearly, as the defendants were able and happy to file their defence (unlawfully out of time) based on my statement of case, the court is now crying more than the bereaved. The court fraudulently acted to block the hearing.
Worse still, unlike in my casethe court has not asked the defendants to state any details of communication or event, the date, place events etc. For example, my landlady Mrs. Virk witnessed Ms. Draper battering me on 23/04/05. Even in July 2006, she confirmed that the police never interviewed her whereas the police have stated in their defence that the evidence of the ‘witnesses’ supported Ms. Draper. Why has the court (in secret) decided to leave the defence to prove their case at the trial but block my claim before trial (in order to corruptly protect freemasonry) whereas I have already detailed all the events in my cbundle including numerous letters?. Where is the equality of arms even in secret court perusal and orders?
8. With all respects Sir, the integrity of the judiciary is at stake here. Judicial corruption and indeed the criminal justice system is not new, as the Bible has already stated (even on behalf of freemasons headed by the prince, Prince Edward) in Micah 7:3:
That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.
I have already sent you evidence from the following websites showing the level:
(1) 48% of the lawyers in the lawyers Crown Prosecution Service are freemasons; see: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm)
(2) 10% of judges and 20% magistrates are freemasons (generally accepted a gross understatement); see: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm.
(3) Home Secretary Jack Straw stated that new judges should declare membership of freemasonry: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm
(4) The C.P.S. is riddled with racism (see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm).
(5) The police is overwhelmed by freemasonry.
9. With all respect Sir, I hereby assert that in accordance with my human rights as guaranteed by the Human Rights Act of 1998, including right to a fair trial, right to remedy, right to not be discriminated against and other provisions in the law, I hereby request again, that you investigate the cases of judicial fraud as detailed in my letter and the attached documents.
With all respect Sir, I hereby remind you that as a public authority of the United Kingdom, you have a duty to conduct an effective investigation into repeated judicial fraud against my person and depriving me of my human rights. I have exceeded the legal requirement i.e. merely to show that arguably, the Court has violated my rights: with specific details of fraud, clearly obvious even at a glance. See Klass v Republic of Germany A 28 (1978), 2 EHRR 214, ECtHR, para 64. From that moment Sir, you are legally compelled to investigate effectively and ensure the prosecution of the offenders and ensure my receipt of justice. See Human Rights Act 1998; Silver v U.K. (1983) 5 EHRR 347, ECtHR; Aydin v Turkey (1997) 25 EHRR 251, 1997-VI 1889; and Assenov v Bulgaria (28 October 1998 unreported), ECtHR.
10. I feel it is unfortunate that while we criticise other countries for human rights violations e.g. Turkey, there is so much violation of human rights even in the judiciary in the U.K especially on behalf of freemasonry. The Bible in Isaiah 59:14-15 says: And judgement is turned away backwards and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen on the street and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey: And the Lord saw it and it displeased Him that there was no judgement.
11. Sir, I believe you are the head of the judiciary so the buck stops at your table whether at the Royal Court of Justice or at the Office of Judicial Complaints. Sir, like I stated before, the judiciary is on trial here; if you do not act it means you have declared the judiciary not fit for purpose. With all respect, God will act, and you would have lost an opportunity to be counted amongst reformers, those who really believe in the rule of law and not judicial fraud and anarchy as sponsored by the freemasons. For the Bible states in Psalm 103:6 states: The LORD executeth righteousness and judgement for all that are oppressed.
With all humility, I hereby state that the former Home Secretary Mr. Charles Clarke left me a foreigner (God forbid, supposedly prisoner) to the freemasons. He left office because of foreign prisoners. Last year I did inform the Prime Minister that he tackle freemasonry or God would remove him from office like King Nebuchadnedezzar in the Bible, who ate grass (the modern equivalent is lame duck). You are a witness to the events that have unfolded. I am not rejoicing at the discomfort of others, neither am I declaring myself holy (only God is Holy) but stating that God will always give victory to Israel, those who call upon His Name.
Please investigate the case of judicial fraud against me, even by the court at the headquarters of the judiciary: the Royal Court of Justice Strand. When the court begins to state that a person (Prince Edward) is above the law and because of that, the court unlawfully and corruptly seeks to destroy the judiciary, the court is sponsoring anarchy to replace the rule of law. Is it any surprise that youths no longer vote and now resort to terrorism, believing that the system is extremely corrupt and will not provide remedy.
In my previous complaint to you, I made an affidavit of judicial corruption by judges in the County Court. Unfortunately, you refused to investigate. If my claims are untrue, please prosecute me for perjury.
12. I believe there is a satanic plan to flood me with judicial fraud in order to overwhelm me so that I will give up, even as the Bible states Like death, the wicked are never satisfied. I trust in the Word of God that states in Isaiah 54: Behold they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake. No weapon that is fashioned against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgement, thou shalt condemn.
I have sent with this letter and evidence to your offices both at the Royal court of Justice Strand and your office at the Office of Judicial Complaints. and copies to interested international persons and bodies.
13. I leave you with Deuteronomy 1:16: And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. Ye shall not respect persons in judgement; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of man; for the judgment is God’s. You can see that the judgement is God’s not mine, and any judicial fraud is against God.
May God bless you with strength and courage. Amen.
Many thanks.. Sincerely,
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
126 CHADWELL HEATH LANE • ROMFORD, ESSEX • RM6 4AE
UNITED KINGDOM
posted by jato | 2:57 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home