Will the freemasons plan another attack

link to yahoo; judicial fraud uk; uk judiciary

Royal Court of Justice, Strand. Case no: HQ06X00636:

Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)

Notice to the court: warning of possible unlawful acts of the Defendants.:
The Claimant hereby notifies the court of the following.

1. In Nigeria, the satanic cult the freemasons and its offshoot the pyrates confraternity, murdered Ejoke Ovadje (beloved brother of the Claimant). They shot him in the carotid artery of his neck, just a stone throw from the court premises.

He was a solicitor. His crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the interests of members of these cults.

The Nigerian Police (under the direction of these cults) refused to investigate.

2. That in February 2005, the Claimant lived in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford. Another tenant Ms. Draper (on behalf of the freemasons) repeatedly poisoned the Claimant.

The Claimant reported the case at Ilford police station and followed up with letters. The Defendants refused to investigate.

Clearly, Ms. Draper acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.

Ms. Draper’s husband had previously boasted even if you report to the police nothing will happen.

3 On 23 April 2005 (a freemasonic-planned day of evil i.e. 23-4-5, akin to 9-11 of al-Queda), Ms. Draper (sponsored by the freemasons) battered the Claimant with more than forty blows, repeatedly bit him, and threatened and almost killed him with a six-inch blade knife that she pressed against the carotid artery of his neck, just like the Nigerian freemasons killed his brother.

Like the Nigeria Police (in the case of the murder of Ejoke Ovadje), the Defendants (the premier U.K. Police) refused to investigate these heinous crimes against the Claimant. They even refused to ask for or search for the knife or take any evidence because it was a Saturday night.

Clearly, Ms. Draper acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.

4. In July 2005, at the same Courtland Avenue, the Defendants sponsored Carl (another tenant) to assault the Claimant. The intention was clear, to use Carl’s assault to muddle the case against Ms. Draper and cover up their corrupt actions. They acted to present Ms. Draper’s assault, battery & attempted murder as a ‘community relations issue’. See pages 113-116. But God exposed the wiles of the Defendants.

5. The same Defendants repeatedly kidnapped (falsely arrested) the Claimant and unlawfully imprisoned (detained) him fourteen times. On 19 April 2006, the Defendants imprisoned the Claimant at New Scotland Yard for the ‘crime’ of attempting to serve the Defendants with court papers of this claim.
The Defendant’s intent was clear: they repeatedly kidnapped (unlawfully arrested) & imprisoned the Claimant so as to ‘reduce’ the impact of their unlawful and evil actions and to ‘overload’ the Claimant with fourteen claims all on the same issue; just like in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.

6. ‘Out of the blue’ the Claimant was evicted from his home at the beginning of this winter. God in His Infinite Grace (unmerited favour) prevented the Claimant from being rendered homeless in winter; He provided rented accommodation and delayed the cold weather until the Claimant had packed to his new residence, a house-share.

7. Following the Defendants track record of repeating crimes in order to muddle issues, the Claimant knows it is possible that the Defendants will organise another ‘Ms. Draper’ (in this new house-share) so as to muddle issues in court and to present a ‘community relations issue’ regarding the Claimant.
For the record:
(a)The Claimant has been entirely reserved with the co-tenants whether male or female, whether white, black or green.
(b) Whereas the co-tenants seem good people, knowing the track record of the Defendants, the Claimant has opted for caution and is as formal as possible. He has said the occasional hello and the occasional very brief talk only on God (and no other issue) with one or two male tenants.
(c)There can be no question of the Claimant entering another tenant’s room or vice versa, whether male or female, whether white, black or blue.
(d) The house is just a stone throw from the court, just as the spot where Ejoke Ovadje (the Claimants brother) was killed, in Nigeria. Ms. Draper (under sponsorship) battered and almost murdered the Claimant at ‘Courtland’ Avenue.
(e) At the Claimants last residence (his own home), the freemasons organised the electricity company to cut off supply in winter, even though the Claimant was not owing a penny. They kept the Claimant in darkness for two months without electricity even though they knew the heating depended on electricity, confirming the Bible in Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Thank God for Col2:10: Ye are complete in Christ Who is the Head of all principalities and powers.
(e) If the Defendants plan any evil against the Claimant, God will foil such plans even as the Bible states in Isaiah 54:17: Behold they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake. No weapon fashioned against thee shall prosper and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.
(f) The Claimant has NO intention of calling the police (the Defendants) UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, even if (God forbid) a tenant or any other sponsored assailant points a gun at him. The assailant will have to call the Defendants by himself (herself) after God destroys such evil attack.
(g) The Claimant hereby states that his trust is in God (not because he is holy, but because of God’s Mercy) even as the Bible states in Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.

Statement of truth

Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)
I hereby declare that the statements I have made in this notice and all its contents are true and I understand that it may be placed before the court.
Signed date: 13/11/06

WILL the freemasons plan another attack?

Royal Court of Justice, Strand. Case no: HQ06X00636:

Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)

Notice to the court: warning of possible unlawful acts of the Defendants.:

The Claimant hereby notifies the court of the following.

1. In Nigeria, the satanic cult the freemasons and its offshoot the pyrates confraternity, murdered Ejoke Ovadje (beloved brother of the Claimant). They shot him in the carotid artery of his neck, just a stone throw from the court premises.

He was a solicitor. His crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the interests of members of these cults.

The Nigerian Police (under the direction of these cults) refused to investigate.

2. That in February 2005, the Claimant lived in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford. Another tenant Ms. D (on behalf of the freemasons) repeatedly poisoned the Claimant.

The Claimant reported the case at Ilford police station and followed up with letters. The Defendants refused to investigate.

Clearly, Ms. Draper acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.

Ms. D husband had previously boasted even if you report to the police nothing will happen.

3 On 23 April 2005 (a freemasonic-planned day of evil i.e. 23-4-5, akin to 9-11 of al-Queda), Ms. D (sponsored by the freemasons) battered the Claimant with more than forty blows, repeatedly bit him, and threatened and almost killed him with a six-inch blade knife that she pressed against the carotid artery of his neck, just like the Nigerian freemasons killed his brother.

Like the Nigeria Police (in the case of the murder of Ejoke Ovadje), the Defendants (the premier U.K. Police) refused to investigate these heinous crimes against the Claimant. They even refused to ask for or search for the knife or take any evidence because it was a Saturday night.

Clearly, Ms. D acted with the authority and/or justification and/or excuse and/or protection and/or deliberate acquiescence of the Defendants and their institution, instruments of the state of the United Kingdom i.e. the Defendants tortured the Claimant.

4. In July 2005, at the same Courtland Avenue, the Defendants sponsored Mr. C (another tenant) to assault the Claimant. The intention was clear, to use Carl’s assault to muddle the case against Ms. D and cover up their corrupt actions. They acted to present Ms. D assault, battery & attempted murder as a ‘community relations issue’. See pages 113-116. But God exposed the wiles of the Defendants.

5. The same Defendants repeatedly kidnapped (falsely arrested) the Claimant and unlawfully imprisoned (detained) him fourteen times. On 19 April 2006, the Defendants imprisoned the Claimant at New Scotland Yard for the ‘crime’ of attempting to serve the Defendants with court papers of this claim.

The Defendant’s intent was clear: they repeatedly kidnapped (unlawfully arrested) & imprisoned the Claimant so as to ‘reduce’ the impact of their unlawful and evil actions and to ‘overload’ the Claimant with fourteen claims all on the same issue; just like in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.

6. ‘Out of the blue’ the Claimant was evicted from his home at the beginning of this winter. God in His Infinite Grace (unmerited favour) prevented the Claimant from being rendered homeless in winter; He provided rented accommodation and delayed the cold weather until the Claimant had packed to his new residence, a house-share.

7. Following the Defendants track record of repeating crimes in order to muddle issues, the Claimant knows it is possible that the Defendants will organise another ‘Ms. D’ (in this new house-share) so as to muddle issues in court and to present a ‘community relations issue’ regarding the Claimant.
For the record:

(a)The Claimant has been entirely reserved with the co-tenants whether male or female, whether white, black or green.

(b) Whereas the co-tenants seem good people, knowing the track record of the Defendants, the Claimant has opted for caution and is as formal as possible. He has said the occasional hello and the occasional very brief talk only on God (and no other issue) with one or two male tenants.

(c)There can be no question of the Claimant entering another tenant’s room or vice versa, whether male or female, whether white, black or blue.

(d) The house is just a stone throw from the court, just as the spot where Ejoke Ovadje (the Claimants brother) was killed, in Nigeria. Ms. D (under sponsorship) battered and almost murdered the Claimant at ‘Courtland’ Avenue.

(e) At the Claimants last residence (his own home), the freemasons organised the electricity company to cut off supply in winter, even though the Claimant was not owing a penny. They kept the Claimant in darkness for two months without electricity even though they knew the heating depended on electricity, confirming the Bible in Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Thank God for Col 2:10: Ye are complete in Christ Who is the Head of all principalities and powers.

(e) If the Defendants plan any evil against the Claimant, God will foil such plans even as the Bible states in Isaiah 54:17: Behold they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake. No weapon fashioned against thee shall prosper and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.

(f) The Claimant has NO intention of calling the police (the Defendants) UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, even if (God forbid) a tenant or any other sponsored assailant points a gun at him. The assailant will have to call the Defendants by himself (herself) after God destroys such evil attack.

(g) The Claimant hereby states that his trust is in God (not because he is holy, but because of God’s Mercy) even as the Bible states in Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.

Statement of truth

Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje (the Claimant) v Metropolitan Police and Commissioner (Defendants)
I hereby declare that the statements I have made in this notice and all its contents are true and I understand that it may be placed before the court.
Signed date: 13/11/06

Masonic fraud at hearing on 09 November 2006 at the Strand

Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje

09 November 2006

Lord Phillips
Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales
Royal Court of Justice at the Strand, London WC2A 2LL

Dear Sir: Application for Judicial Review; Royal Court of Justice, Strand: Case no: CO/765/06: Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje v Attorney General of the United Kingdom and the Crown Prosecution Service.

1. I attended the ‘hearing’ of my application today as an observer. I appreciate it that the judges determined my application based on my written submissions.

2. Unfortunately, I believe it was a sad day for the rule of law in this great country. From what I heard, the judgment was not God’s judgment i.e. it was not equitable, even as. Ms. Draper’s husband had earlier boasted even if you report the matter to the police, nothing would happen.

At the end of the day, I trust in God Whose Word (the Bible) states in Psalm 103:6: The Lord executeh righteousness and judgment for all that are oppressed.

3. In accordance with the law, I have only 7 days to file an appeal. When I asked for the written judgement today, I was told it could take three days or more for me to receive it. Nothing definite.

4. As far as I know, it takes less than five minutes to print a judgement that was being typed as the judge was speaking. I am uncertain why it would take long to see it.

5. Sir, I would really appreciate it if you could prevail and enable to court to send me the judgment tomorrow by first class mail, so that I can get it on Saturday 11 November 2006. I would also appreciate it if the judgement could be sent to me by e-mail at:

jatovadje@yahoo.com

6. I make this plea especially as I am not a lawyer and I need all the maximum time to prepare my appeal, all within seven days.

7. Obviously, if one cannot receive the judgment in time to study and file an appeal, then we can safely assume that there is no room for appeal in the U.K.; and that the rule of law, CPR, Human Rights Act 1998 (including access to justice and materials) are just mere words that are of no effect..

8. I have sent a copy of this letter to Room C315, The Administrative Court Office.

Many thanks. God bless you Sir.

Signed date: 09/11/06
140 St. Mary’s Road, Ilford, IG1 1QY.

You are invited to hearing on 09 November 2006

Application for Judicial Review; Royal Court of Justice, Strand:
Case no: CO/765/06

Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje v Attorney General of the United Kingdom and the Crown Prosecution Service.

Dear Sir/ Madam, You are invited to the hearing of the above case on Thursday 09 November 2006 (9-11) at 11:30 am.

Come and see whether the rule of law exists in the U.K or freemasonic corruption will triumph.

1.In February 2005, Dr. Ovadje rented accommodation in a house share at 48 Courtland Avenue, Ilford..

In February 2005 Ms. D (one of the tenants, a married woman) repeatedly poisoned Dr. Ovadje with insecticide and he became breathless. He reported to the Metropolitan Police. Unfortunately the police refused to investigate even though his life was clearly threatened.

Ms. Draper was sponsored by the freemasons to kill Dr. Ovadje.

2. On 23/04/05 Ms. S D for no just cause burst into Dr. Ovadje’s room and battered him with more than forty blows and repeatedly bit him. Then she threatened to kill Dr. Ovadje and almost killed him as she pressed the tip of a six-inch bladed knife against the carotid artery of his neck. She committed at least 15 offences against the person. Again, the Metropolitan Police refused to investigate these heinous crimes because it was on a Saturday night.

Ms. D was sponsored by the freemasons to kill Dr. Ovadje on a memorable 23-4-5 akin to 9-11 of al-Queda. Prior to 23/04/05, on an occasion when Ms. Draper harassed Dr. Ovadje, her husband had boasted that if Dr. Ovadje reported any matter to the police, nothing would happen because they are connected.

But the evidence was so glaring that even the corrupt masonic actions of the police could not destroy the evidence:
(a)Ms. S. D. destroyed many things in Dr. Ovadje’s room as witnessed by police
(b)Ms. S. D. tore Dr. Ovadje’s shirt that he wore on the night she battered him and almost killed him. Dr. Ovadje gave the shirt to the police as evidence.
(c) Ms. S. D. severely beat (more than forty blows) and repeatedly bit Dr. Ovadje that night. The policemen saw his injuries. The hospital where he received treatment, recorded the injuries. (d) There are photographs of the bites Ms. S. D. inflicted on Dr. Ovadje.
(e) The Crown Prosecution Service in a letter to Dr. Ovadje dated 01/12/05, confirmed that the Metropolitan Police saw the injuries Ms. D. inflicted on Dr. Ovadje’s body.

3. Dr. Ovadje complained to the Attorney General (Lord Goldsmith) and requested him (A.G.) to advise the police to do a better job. Against the law including the Human Rights Act 1998 and Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, the Attorney General corruptly refused to take an action.

4. Against all the abundant evidence, the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service corruptly and maliciously refused to prosecute Ms. D. for any of the at least fifteen criminal offences she committed against Dr. Ovadje despite the overwhelming evidence e.g. assault, battery and bodily harm backed by photographs, hospital record and even the C.P.S. own confirmation that the police saw the injuries. See Offences Against the Person Act 1861.

5. Worse, the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service colluded with Ms. D. (who battered and almost killed Dr. Ovadje) to concoct a ‘secret and fictitious Ms. Draper’s version of events’ and refused to release the ‘secret and Ms. Draper’s version of events’.

Then they falsely presented a false and vague allegation that Dr. Ovadje, the victim, had acted against Ms. D. in a yet to be specified way. The action of the Defendants confirmed Ms. Draper’s husband’s boast: even if you report to the police, nothing would happen because they are connected (as freemasons and otherwise).

6. A court official at the Royal Court of Justice Strand (the headquarters of the U.K. judiciary) whilst performing masonic rituals in the afternoon physically tried to prevent Dr. Ovadje filing this claim saying 'you cannot sue the Attorney General'.

7. Agents of the Defendants in a mafiosi-like action removed a book titled ‘Human Rights Practice’ which is the authority on Human Rights Law (the basis for Dr. Ovadje’s case against the Attorney General and Crown Prosecution Service) from the reference section of Redbridge Library (books from the reference section cannot be borrowed). Dr. Ovadje had been relying on the book to prepare the Grounds for judicial review and cases to cite.

The library staff acknowledged the disappearance of the book but refused to report it to the police, thus confirming that they were in the know of the masonic disappearance.

8. The court has corruptly refused to determine any of the applications made by Dr. Ovadje including:
(a)that the court declare that the judge and court officials handling this application are not freemasons. The reason being that the basis of this case is that the freemasons sponsored Ms. Draper to kill Dr. Ovadje.

Moreover, parliament and the Home Secretary have already expressed serious concern at the number of judges (10%) and magistrates (20%) and Crown Prosecutors (48%) are freemasons and its effect on justice i.e. justice must not only be done but be seen to be done.

See: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmhaff/467/46703.htm)

The Home Secretary Jack stated that new judges should declare membership of freemasonry, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm

The C.P.S. is riddled with racism, see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/557543.stm

The Cabinet Secretary has against the law (Freedom of Information Act) refused to confirm the members of the cabinet including the Attorney General that are freemasons.

If the Attorney General and Crown Prosecutors that corruptly refused to prosecute Ms. D. are freemasons and if the judge and court officers are also freemasons, then it is clear that there can be no justice.

(b) that the court should determine Dr. Ovadje’s application without a hearing even though this is his legal right even as indicated in form N244, see Human Rights Act 1998 and CPR. The obvious conclusion is with a written determination reduces cheating. With an oral hearing, the judge can claim after hearing the Claimant……..

9. The court has corruptly (against the Administrative court rules) refused Dr. Ovadje to submit his skeletal arguments. The rules state that the court would notify Dr. Ovadje to submit his skeletal arguments; but the court never did but proceeded to determine the application without the skeletal arguments so that fraud may be perpetrated.

Judicial fraud is not new, even on behalf of the freemasons head by a prince, Prince Edward. The Bible states in Micah 7:3: That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the Prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.

10. The terrorist and satanic organisation, the freemasons, in Nigeria murdered Dr. Ovadje’s brother, Ejoke Ovadje. Ejoke Ovadje was a solicitor in Nigeria. He had earlier been invited to join the freemasons with a bait of winning cases before he gets to court, an offer he refused. Clearly judicial fraud is part and parcel of freemasonry.

His (Ejoke’s) crime was to run for public office on an anti-corruption platform against the corrupt interests of satanic and masonic elite that loot the oil funds whilst 250, 000 Nigerian children die of malnutrition and poverty related diseases every year and 75% of the population live on less than a dollar a day. He was warned that his lives of freemasons are guaranteed in politics.

This satanic masonic elite murdered at least 10,000 people to ‘win’ the last elections. Not surprisingly, Mr. Jack Straw then Foreign Secretary was the first to congratulate the murderous Nigerian Government. In return, other oil companies are discouraged from the Nigerian oil industry apart from Shell. It is obvious that comparatively, Mugabe is a saint.

11. In London U.K. in 2000, Dr. Ovadje refused to be a ‘dog’, a pyrate (an offshoot of the freemasons). God foiled the attempt of the freemasons and pyrates to murder him in London in 2000. It is therefore not surprising that the freemasons sponsored Ms. Draper to kill Dr. Ovadje whilst ‘guaranteeing her protection using the instruments of the state i.e. the Attorney General and the Crown Prosecution Service.

Moreover, Dr. Ovadje has openly and legally campaigned against the freemasons for murdering his brother, even at Trafalgar Square.

Come and see whether there is rule of law in the U.K. or if anarchy and masonic law (and judicial fraud) will triumph.

Come to the venue: Administrative Court, Royal Court of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL, time 11:30 am on 9 November 2006.


J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)

140 St. Mary’s Road
Ilford
IG1 1QY.